Category: Food

  • Tastemade Free Streaming: Cooking Shows Beyond the Reruns

    Tastemade Free Streaming: Cooking Shows Beyond the Reruns

    Kitchen Glow Up, Worth the Hype, and Forking Delicious show why Tastemade’s free channels deserve more than background-rerun status. Read more →

    a free food channel could easily spend the rest of eternity showing somebody chop an onion in an episode from 2009. Tastemade has decided it can also make new television. this is an encouraging development for both television and the onion.

    Tastemade’s free streaming channels carry food, travel, and home programming. they are also homes for original shows, with scheduled premieres rather than just an endless supply of rescued reruns. here are three starting points for figuring out whether that particular variety of television belongs on your screen.

    Kitchen Glow Up: renovation through a cook’s eyes

    Kitchen Glow Up pairs Ellen Bennett’s cooking and design perspective with homeowners whose kitchens need to function better. its first two episodes premiered on Tastemade’s streaming channel on May 28, 2024. the current show page lists two seasons.

    Ellen Bennett smiling in a bright kitchen in promotional artwork for Kitchen Glow Up
    Promotional image: Tastemade; used for commentary.

    the premise is appealing because a kitchen has actual work to do. there is a difference between a room that photographs well and a room where you can drain pasta without performing a minor obstacle course. renovation television is much more interesting when that difference makes it into the brief.

    this is the first stop if you want home television with a specific point of view. a useful counter needs to survive contact with dinner, not merely an arrangement of lemons.

    Worth the Hype: let somebody else investigate lunch

    Worth the Hype sends Frankie Celenza around cities to explore restaurants, dishes, and the people making them. Tastemade’s show page now lists three seasons, with recent stops including Charleston, San Antonio, New Jersey, and San Francisco.

    Frankie Celenza holding a taco in promotional artwork for Worth the Hype
    Promotional image: Tastemade; used for commentary.

    food travel is an excellent television format because the stakes are comprehensible. somebody made a thing, somebody else would like to eat it, and we might learn something about a place in the process. no cinematic universe needs to be consulted.

    choose this one if your preferred background television occasionally becomes foreground television because a sandwich has appeared. I respect the sandwich’s ability to secure an audience without a season-long mystery.

    Forking Delicious: food opinions become the show

    Forking Delicious turns an audience-ranked list of 100 dishes into a discussion among comedians and food personalities. Tastemade’s launch announcement names Margaret Cho, Dulcé Sloan, Eric Wareheim, and Nyesha Arrington among the participants. the first two episodes aired in a double premiere on February 25, 2025.

    this is food television for the part of the internet that can turn a completely ordinary lunch into a constitutional dispute. the comedy comes from giving people something concrete to disagree about. finally, a panel discussion where the subject might improve my afternoon.

    how to watch Tastemade free

    use Tastemade’s where-to-watch page to find a free channel on your platform, then check that channel’s guide for the show. the network also sells ad-free, on-demand access. its subscription help page explains those paid options; they are not required to watch the free linear feed.

    the practical distinction is selection versus price. the free schedule chooses what is on now. a paid on-demand option may make selecting a particular episode easier. you can decide whether that convenience is worth anything to you.

    I like that Tastemade has a recognizable purpose. food, places, and homes are broad enough to provide variety, but related enough that leaving the channel on does not feel like a programming accident.

    previously in this series

    This is part 2 of Stuff You Can Watch Free. The series covers original shows on free networks and channels that recreate cable’s put-it-on-and-leave-it-on experience.

  • the marshmallow does not need you to defend its racist name

    the marshmallow does not need you to defend its racist name

    a follow-up to the world’s most racist snack: chocolate, nostalgia, and the people making solidarity purchases on behalf of a confectionery label. Read more →

    There are two kinds of posts on this website: the ones I labored over like they were going to be taught in a seminar someday, and the ones where I embed a strange little video with a title that looks like it was generated by a haunted search bar.

    Guess which one Google decided it had opinions about.

    In July, I posted a short video about the chocolate-covered marshmallow treats that have, in different places and at different times, been sold under names built out of racist caricatures. It was mostly a “huh, that is bleak” drive-by. Then it started showing up in the site’s search data next to queries like most racist snack, racist snack name, and the world’s most racist snack. Not huge numbers, exactly, but it is now one of the little site’s more persistent visitors. Apparently this is what the people need from taco ’bout it: snack-based colonial hangovers.

    it’s a marshmallow, not an archival document

    The treat itself is straightforward: a biscuit or wafer base, a whipped marshmallow-ish center, and a chocolate coating. Depending on where you are, a perfectly normal name exists for it: Schokokuss (“chocolate kiss”), Schaumkuss (“foam kiss”), or simply chocolate-coated marshmallow treat.

    That is why the usual defense of “it’s just tradition” never quite works for me. Tradition is not a force of nature. It is a series of choices that people keep making because nobody has bothered to make a different one. We managed to put a marshmallow on a wafer and enrobe it in chocolate. Surely we can also call it a chocolate kiss without acting like someone has confiscated grandmother’s entire kitchen.

    But the older names that linger in parts of Europe are where it gets ugly. Variants translated to “Moor’s head,” “Negro’s kiss,” and other terms that turn an actual racial category—or an old colonial fantasy of one—into a cute little product description. The point was not just “it’s brown because chocolate.” The imagery attached to those names did the rest: Blackness reduced to a cartoon head, a dark coating, a novelty.

    A chocolate-coated vanilla foam sweet with its white filling and wafer base exposed.
    Photo: Tiia Monto / Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

    the weird part is how small the fix is

    No one is asking anyone to stop eating the thing. This is not a campaign against snacks, which would be both doomed and personally offensive to me. It is a request to stop using a name that makes a person’s identity into the punchline and then demanding everybody else treat the discomfort as an overreaction.

    And the replacement names are not even bad. “Chocolate kiss” is kind of sweet. “Foam kiss” has the energy of a discontinued 1980s perfume, but it is still leagues better than making a confectionery aisle reenact colonial racism. The food is the same food. The recipe has not been silenced. Nothing has been erased except the part nobody needed.

    There is a particular kind of nostalgia that mistakes familiarity for innocence. You grew up hearing a word, so it feels harmless; someone else hears the history packed into it, and suddenly the word is political. But it was already political. It just had the advantage of being old enough to pass as décor.

    anyway, congratulations to the algorithm

    So yes: the original video is a weirdly effective little piece of internet detritus. It points at something real, it has a title people are apparently compelled to type into a search engine, and now it has earned itself a follow-up post in which I get to say the obvious part out loud.

    If you want the snack, have the snack. Just call it a snack. We are all capable of surviving a product rename, even if the internet’s search habits suggest we may never stop being fascinated by the phrase “racist marshmallow.”

    Further reading: Swissinfo’s reporting on the Swiss debate and a 2019 study of media responses to the “Mohrenkopf” controversy.